Wednesday, February 24, 2010

MaryJane Duchene_Ann Montgomery Remand A10-12

WED.24Feb10 MJ Duchene US Dist. crim 10-12(ADM)

PLEA4JUSTICE: LOCAL ORDINANCE'S USED TO CRIMINALLY VIOLATE,PROTECTED PERSONS

To whom it may concern: US Attorney 4 MN Hon. B.Todd Jones et al
State of Minnesota District CourtCounty of Dakota First Judicial DistrictNotice of Motion and Motion to Vacate andCity of West St. Paul, Plaintiff, Reverse the Order of September 03, 2009Refusing to Dismissvs.Citation no. 3-441797Mary Jane Duchene, Defendant Court file: 19WS-CR-09-15734

When State and Federal Judges Publish "Orders" contrary to Law, then the US Attorney must
intervene.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article03/14.html
who as an Honorable Black US Attorney must protect also the Right,
Priviledges of All Person , also trigger Inquiry into the Federal Bench specifically Ann Montgomery in the US re: 1866 Civil Rights Act.
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=480

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.


We the undersigned: are duly concerned for The
Safety,Health,Welfare of Litigant MaryJane Duchene Beautiful White Woman who in Protected Class of Citizens, mandated by State and Federal Laws.

Good Faith request must trigger Enforcement of our Laws for All Citizens, not only "racially" removals.

The Violence against Ms. Duchene by Public Officials and Persons unk is pervase. we allege that the "Good Will" Compassion to Advocate for others ie: Alice Krengel
and to educate the Public on the Tech of the Web has triggered the Bogus Criminal
Noisy Dog Ordinance alleged violations.
STATE & FEDERAL QUESTIONS;
Please review the now Published "Order" by Federal Judge Ann Montgomery, Mary Jane DuchenePlaintiff: City of West St PaulDefendant: Mary Jane Duchene Case Number: 0:2010cr00012Filed: January 13, 2010 Court: Minnesota District CourtOffice: DMN Office [ Court Info ] Notice of Electronic Filing 1/20/2010 LINK

REMAND: 2/19/2010
U.S. Constitution: Article III
JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT AND INFERIOR FEDERAL COURTS
Cases Arising Under the Constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States
Cases arising under the Constitution are cases that require an interpretation of the Constitution for their correct decision. 648 They arise when a litigant claims an actual or threatened invasion of his constitutional rights by the enforcement of some act of public authority, usually an act of Congress or of a state legislature, and asks for judicial relief. The clause furnishes the principal textual basis for the implied power of judicial review of the constitutionality of legislation and other official acts.
Development of Federal Question Jurisdiction .--Almost from the beginning, the Convention demonstrated an intent to create ''federal question'' jurisdiction in the federal courts with regard to federal laws; 649 such cases involving the Constitution and treaties were added fairly late in the Convention as floor amendments. 650 But when Congress enacted the Judiciary Act of 1789, it did not confer general federal question jurisdiction on the inferior federal courts but left litigants to remedies in state courts with appeals to the United States Supreme Court if judgment went against federal constitutional claims. 651 Although there were a few juris dictional provisions enacted in the early years, 652 it was not until the period following the Civil War that Congress, in order to protect newly created federal civil rights and in the flush of nationalist sentiment, first created federal jurisdiction in civil rights cases 653 and then in 1875 conferred general federal question jurisdiction on the lower federal courts. 654 Since that time, the trend generally has been toward conferral of ever-increasing grants of jurisdiction to enforce the guarantees recognized and enacted by Congress. 655
When a Case Arises Under .--The 1875

By information and belief: the most recent Published "Order" by Federal Judge Ann Montgomery, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=28+U.S.C.+%A7+1446%28c%29%284%29.&btnG=Google+Search Has apparantly alleged only Blacks can remove cases:

d) "A civil action in any State court arising under section 40302 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 may not be removed to any district court of the United States. "


Click here: http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate6/2009dog/10112986035.pdf

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate6/2009dog/10112986035.pdf


Do you have tim Kinley's Fed. Case with Ann Montgomery?
FURTHER:

Montgomery LOCKED the Federal Door acting in concort with US Attorney Lonie Brant(sp) 1997 when Sharon sued the Dr. Mckay and the Sec.VA to save husbands life, Montgomery was obstructing legal process as She knew Sharons Husband was at Brainard State Hospital........ Sharons witness at that time was Dick Bullock and John Richardson, both deceased, Bullock prosecuted "Denied" Removals to Ann Montgomery.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Sharon+Anderson+v.+Ann+Montgomery+Fed.+Judge

Sharon4Anderson - 8 visits - 12/23/09
Political Activist check Lufsky File: current Judge Leslie Metzen ... to deny online voting is misappropriation of Federal Grants of HAVA moneys. ..... VA Widow Sharon Anderson has been reduced to Poverty contrary to Title 18 sec. .... the make up of the Board Water Commissioners Harris,Thune,Montgomery I can live ...sharon4anderson.blogspot.com/ - Cached
Sharon4Anderson 's Popular Documents Scribd - 2 visits - 9/14/09
NON FICTION:Heinous Behavior by Fed.Judge Ann Montgomery who locked the Courtroom, ... Answer CrossComplaint Sharon Anderson v. City St. Paul ...www.scribd.com/people/documents/2054990-sharon-anderson?...1 - Cached
Sa 8th Cir Rose Tulane
Sharon Anderson seeks recusal of the Honorable Judge James Rosenbaum, and, ... See also Hall v. Small Business Administration, 695 F.2d 175 (5th Cir. ... with former US Attorney Robert Small complicit with Federal Judge Ann Montgomery, ...www.slideshare.net/guest90299f9/sa-8th-cir-rose-tulane-presentation - Cached
TimKinley62F1-96-000163(Cleary)
+ · Sharon Anderson, 45 minutes ago ... Crt. 62F1-96-00013, Appealled xxx(Toussaint) Removed to Federal Court Ann Montgomery,14 years the Courts have manulipated ... Sharon v. Judge Edward Toussaint A… Sharons Petition Enbanc A09-2031 ...www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/timkinley62f16000163cleary - Cached

[PDF]
FURTHER: KNOWING BOB BEALE A CHRISTEN WOULD NEVER THREATEN A FED. JUDGE VIA PHONE. BEALE IS NOT THAT STUPID
APPARANTLY THE FEDERAL JUDGE ANN MONTGOMERY IS IN A PATTERENED OF JUDICIAL ORDERS, CONTRARY TO CIVIL RIGHTS CODE http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Bob+Beale+v.+Ann+Montgomery+MN&btnG=Google+Search

Defendant: God 'wants me to get rid of' the judge StarTribune.com
Apr 21, 2008 ... The trial of millionaire tax protester Robert Beale turned ... "Once I take down Ann Montgomery, no judge in the whole court will have ... But he fled Minnesota before his trial could be held and was ... Beale also told Pelton that "God needs us to be like Gideon against the [Midianites] -- 300 vs. ...www.startribune.com/17984759.html - Cached
Up to

Karen S. Runyon Forensic Document Examiner
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLJudge Ann D. Montgomery. David McGlaughlin, Assistant United States Attorney. April 26, 1999 ... Sharon Langeslag v. KYMN, Inc., et al. Rice County, MN. Court File No. C1-99-892, Judge Gerald Wolf ... Theresa K. Anderson-Chapman v. Perry Eugene Carpentier .... Minneapolis Federal Courthouse, Judge Michael Davis ...www.forensicexpertise.com/uploads/expert.../runyon_cv.pdf - Similar


LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

/s/ Bill Dahn
42 USC 3631 Homestead at 256 Morton St. W.St.Paul,MN ECF:#P1291866Ojj_Sioux #408B1911http://www.billdahn.com/ http://www.billdahn.blogspot.com/http://www.mklaw.com/documents/20090226105116227.pdfHomestead Act of 1862

No comments:

Post a Comment