Fri.20Jul2018 SharonsSemperFiStatement as to Why Sharon constantly runs4MNAG. Give you Children a Hug, Teach them well.
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
Saturday, July 21, 2018
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
CitySt.PaulExcessiveConsumptionviaFraudvsSharon4Anderson697SurreyAve
Records follow the Office not the person
Guess this stuff keeps me alive.
From: sharon4anderson@aol.com
To: Chris.Samuel@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, todd.d.axtell@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, russ.stark@ci.stpaul.mn.us, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, marcia.moermond@ci.stpaul.mn.us, chris.tolbert@ci.stpaul.mn.us, amy.brendmoen@ci.stpaul.mn.us, jane.prince@ci.stpaul.mn.us, rebecca.noecker@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dai.thao@ci.stpaul.mn.us, chiefclerk@co.ramsey.mn.us, victoria.reinhardt@co.ramsey.mn.us, AskVR@co.ramsey.mn.us, janice.rettman@co.ramsey.mn.us, mark.voerding@co.ramsey.mn.us, toni.carter@co.ramsey.mn.us, rafael.e.ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, ken.iosso@co.ramsey.mn.us, jim.mcdonough@co.ramsey.mn.us, joann.ellis@co.ramsey.mn.us, darren.tobolt@co.ramsey.mn.us, lee.mehrkens@co.ramsey.mn.us, askpropertytaxandrecords@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections@co.ramsey.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, examineroftitles@co.ramsey.mn.us, mnext-ramsey@umn.edu, info@rchs.com, contacthr@co.ramsey.mn.us, ContactRamseyCounty@co.ramsey.mn.us, rcmg@umn.edu, parks@co.ramsey.mn.us, tamarack@co.ramsey.mn.us, askPW@co.ramsey.mn.us, askcountyrecorder@co.ramsey.mn.us, asksurveyor@co.ramsey.mn.us, askveteransservice@co.ramsey.mn.us, maria.wetherall@co.ramsey.mn.us, askph@co.ramsey.mn.us, askeh@co.ramsey.mn.us, wayne.anderson@co.ramsey.mn.us, nathan.bissonette@co.ramsey.mn.us, Rafael.E.Ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, fmelo@pioneerpress.com, asksheriff@co.ramsey.mn.us, whistleblowers@startribune.com, bill4dahn@aol.com, james.shiffer@startribune.com, bshaw@pioneerpress.com, mgottfried@pioneerpress.com, fairhousing@usdoj.gov, antitrust@ftc.gov, Melvin.Carter@ci.stpaul.mn.us, todd.hurley@ci.stpaul.mn.us, ricardo.cervantes@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Bruce.Engelbrekt@ci.stpaul.mn.us, chris.samuels@co.ramsey.mn.us, lyndsey.olson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 3/21/2018 4:34:51 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: 697 surrey0809 10_11_12_13forcloasses.infoallForensicFilesExcessiveConsumptionTakingsRICOThanks4responseWed.21Mar2018Sharons Car was never abandoned, fully insured, the Courts were/are an exercise in futility.CITY ST.PAUL RICO ENTERPRISE for decades takings without just compensations,www.sharon4anderson.org Water,Car,Trailers by Fraud,Murder,False Statements to deprive Citizenery of their Rights, Priveledges. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18
for the 2008 RNC
Lawyer Details
Lawyer ID 0187252 Date Admitted 10/16/87 Last Payment 01/06/00
Authorized to Practice Law? NOT AUTHORIZED CLE Status VOLUNTARILY RESTRICTED (BY CHOICE)
Last Name COLEMAN First Name CHRISTOPHER Middle Name BRIEN ADDRESS 2220 FIRSTAR CENTER
101 E. FIFTH STREET
ST. PAUL, MN 55101Foreign Address? No
Professional Liability Insurance Lawyer does NOT represent private clients Candidate Sharon Anderson VA Widow: DisclaimerSharon is a Republican, has been victimized by theDFL Party,and the Department of Safety and Inspections ie: DSIby Retired Director Bob Kessler Pensioned Parasite making 99 thousand yrly, keeping City Pension: great ImpeachmentsFurther Affiants Sayeth not at this time: exceptCandidate Bill Dahn http://www.billdahn.com/ and http://www.billdahn.blogspot.com/intervention with standingas Directly Injured Person in Property Rights at256 Morton St. W St. Paul,Submitted in Good Faith for Title 26 501 c 3 educational,teaching the citizenery to Fight for our Rights,based on False Statements,Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)About Me
Chris Samuel you have confirmed tax payments, do you have a photo of receipts, signed.Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonandersonhttp://www.givemelerty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htmSharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARDMACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) gIn a message dated 3/20/2018 11:12:35 PM Central Standard Time, Chris.Samuel@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US writes:Dear Ms. Anderson,You had asked for confirmation that you have paid the charges included on property taxes for 697 Surrey related to the towing of a car from your property by the City of Saint Paul.On our records for taxes payable in 2008, I show the following special assessments charged to 697 Surrey:S-010083370 Summary Abatement $ 466.96 Based on WhatS-010083500 Summary Abatement 508.88 # # #S-010083620 Abandoned Vehicle 503.36 False Statements by DSI Inspector Joel EsslingS-010083650 Excessive Consumption 76.74Street Maintenance 100.62Storm Sewer 62.14Recycling 27.04Total 2008 special assessments $1,745.74What interest were applied?Total 2008 Taxes and assessments $2,644.00Three payments were received that paid off the amount owed for 2008 in full including penalty, interest and costs associated with late payment of taxes. The tax portion received was:May 2008 $ 449.93April 2010 42.46December 2012 2,151.61Total $ 2,644.00PLEASE PROVIDE SIGNED RECEIPT BY MARK OSWALD FORMER AUDITORI can confirm that the taxes and special assessments owed for Tax Payable Year 2008 have been paid in full.Is this what you are looking for? If not, let me know and I’ll look further when I get back to the office in two weeks.Thanks,ChrisChris Samuel | County Auditor/Treasurer | DirectorRamsey CountyProperty Tax, Records and Election Services90 W Plato BlvdSaint Paul, MN 55107651.266.204118 U.S. Code Chapter 77 - PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING ...
U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 77. 18 U.S. Code Chapter 77 - PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS. Current through Pub. L. 114-38.18 U.S. Code § 1583 - Enticement into slavery | US Law | LII / Legal ...
18 U.S. Code § 1583 - Enticement into slavery ... (b) Whoever violates this section shall be fined under thistitle, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, ...Involuntary Servitude, Forced Labor, And Sex Trafficking Statutes ...
Aug 6, 2015 - Summary: Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition ofslavery, that is, a condition of compulsory service or labor ...MEMORANDUMN OF LAWTom Petters Case Summary | USAO-MN | Department of Justice
On December 2, 2009, after a month-long trial and five days of deliberation, a federal jury convicted Pettersof orchestrating a $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme.MEMORANDUMN
![[Police.jpg]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRUXaCQP7CBInBCtOJbtWnFUaFkk3XMWdnP2P-NypY7zOePVHmXY8Pb1aVrY6Zklb0ZhyaxHS8kMvy4tjCOhWTVLF5efcG9tNHWj6vAM7I7-5u6C3BSwHBwq64BVdz4sUGrVu2WEY1oWQ/s1600/Police.jpg)
Friday, July 30, 2010
Wersal_Weasal4Justice_8thCir_JudicialReformMN
Fri 30Jul10 Please Post FreedomLawSchool and CourtWatcher
Click here: MinnLawyer Blog » Blog Archive » 8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions
Wersal won 8th Cir http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/blog-folder/wersal.pdf VOTE GREG WERSAL FOR MN JUSTICE 2NOV10
Vote Sharon Anderson4 MN_AttorneyGeneral 10Aug10 JUDICIAL REFORM,RESTORETHECONSTITUTION,FREEDOM4PRESS_SPEECH,DUEPROCESS ACCESS TO SEATS OF GOVERNMENT http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ Quo Warranto http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/ POA in the event of Death.
A big day for judicial candidate Greg Wersal
A split three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals this morning issued an opinion sweeping away a couple of the state’s remaining restrictions on judicial campaigns.
The federal appellate court struck down rules barring judicial candidates from endorsing candidates for political offices and from personally soliciting contributions from small groups and individuals.
“[W]e think the Constitution favors strict recusal standards and fewer speech restrictions,” wrote Clarence Arlen Beam for the two-judge majority.
In his dissent, Judge Kermit E. Bye, said, “[W]here a state has crafted its restrictions carefully to maintain a fair and impartial judiciary, in both practice and appearance, as Minnesota has done here, the First Amendment must yield.”
The 54-page decision is Wersal v. Sexton, et al.
The ruling is a huge victory for attorney Greg Wersal, currently running for a seat on the Minnesota Supreme Court against Justice Helen Meyer. Wersal has been on a more than a decade-long quest to end the restrictions Minnesota has placed on judicial campaigns that has taken him on several tips to the 8th Circuit and all the way to U.S. Supreme Court. His challenges have eviscerated the framework for the vast majority of the restrictions.
In a release sent shortly after the ruling was announced, Wersal trumpeted, “This is a major victory toward the goal of holding judges accountable through free, open and competitive elections. I now hope to raise the money necessary to tell the people of Minnesota that the judges, including my opponent in this race, want a constitutional amendment that would strip the public of their right to vote for judges. I will do everything I can to protect the right to vote.”
Proponents of the restrictions had argued that they were necessary to preserve the appearance of an unbiased and unbeholden judiciary.
We will post a fuller story on our main site later today.
One Response to “8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions”
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- Longtime Legal Aid leader Jerry Lane to retire in 2011
- 8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions
- Mood lighting
- Longtime Legal Aid leader Jerry Lane to retire in 2011
Recent Comments
- Levi Swank on 8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions
- Patrick on Mood lighting
- Patrick Thornton on Mood lighting
- Levi Swank on 8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions
Follow us on social media
Click here to learn more about Minnesota Lawyer and our new premium subscription, eAdvantage.
Click here to sign up for FREE legal news updates from Minnesota Lawyer.
Dolan Law Sites
- Lawyers USA
- Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
- Michigan Lawyers Weekly
- Missouri Lawyers Weekly
- North Carolina Lawyers Weekly
- Rhode Island Lawyers Weekly
- South Carolina Lawyers Weekly
- The Daily Record (Baltimore, MD)
- The Daily Record (Rochester, NY)
- Virginia Lawyers Weekly
- Wisconsin Law Journal
- Woman, Esq.
- Lawyers USA
Minnesota partners
State/National Law Blogs
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Feds sue AZ_Immigration_Sharon MN_AG Disagree's
http://digg.com/d31VjFh?t Sharon 4 MN_AG disagree with the Feds "taking-over" State Laws
Justice Department Sues Arizona
The federal government has filed its lawsuit asking a federal judge to strike down most of Arizona's new immigration law, declaring that federal law preempts the action by state lawmakers.
July 06, 2010
Justice Department Sues Arizona
The federal government has filed its lawsuit asking a federal judge to strike down most of Arizona's new immigration law, declaring that federal law preempts the action by state lawmakers.
“In our constitutional system, the federal government has preeminent authority to regulate immigration matters. This authority derives from the United States Constitution and numerous acts of Congress,” reads the introduction to the 25-page complaint (PDF).
Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice filed the complaint today in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The lawsuit names as defendants the state of Arizona and Gov. Janice Brewer (R), in her official capacity.
Brewer has repeatedly defended the law as a necessary response to the federal government’s failure to control illegal immigration from Mexico, and she continued to draw support from allies nationwide, including in Washington, as the lawsuit was filed.
The lawsuit makes sweeping claims about the federal government’s power to develop immigration policy. It cites the federal government’s power under the Constitution to establish a “uniform Rule of Naturalization” — translating, it says, to the regulation of aliens within U.S. boundaries and to the terms and conditions for entry and continued presence.
With the State Department joining as a plaintiff, the lawsuit also cites the president’s authority over foreign affairs. “Immigration law, policy, and enforcement priorities are affected by and have impacts on U.S. foreign policy, and are themselves the subject of diplomatic arrangements,” it says.
Together with the complaint, the department is filing a 58-page motion (PDF) for a preliminary injunction. The law is scheduled to go into effect July 29.
In a news release, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. focused on two concerns: the impact the law could have on immigrants’ willingness to cooperate with local police in criminal investigations, and the police resources that could be diverted from other investigations.
“Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility,” Holder said. “Seeking to address the issue through a patchwork of state laws will only create more problems than it solves.”
In response to the lawsuit, a group of 20 Republicans from the U.S. House of Representatives sent Holder a letter protesting that the Arizona law “is harmonious” with federal immigration law.
“Not only does this lawsuit reveal the Obama Administration’s contempt for immigration laws and the people of Arizona, it reveals contempt for the majority of the American people who support Arizona’s efforts to reduce human smuggling, drug trafficking and illegal immigration,” reads the letter (PDF).
The DOJ lawsuit does not seek to invalidate the entire Arizona immigration law, known as S.B. 1070. It targets sections 1 through 6 of the law (PDF), leaving alone sections about employment and the impounding of vehicles. By contrast, the complaint (PDF) filed by in May by the ACLU and others asks to have the law struck down in its entirety.
Still, those civil rights groups and civil libertarians welcomed the Justice Department's action. Munger, Tolles & Olson is representing the coalition pro bono, and the coalition includes the ACLU, the NAACP, and the National Immigration Law Center.
“States planning to follow in Arizona’s misguided footsteps should take note: the United States cannot and should not allow immigrants and communities of color to be targets of hateful racial profiling legislation that puts their civil liberties on the line,” NILC General Counsel Linton Joaquin said in a statement.
To defend the state, Brewer has hired John Bouma, chairman of Snell & Wilmer in Phoeniz, because Arizona’s attorney general, Terry Goddard III (D), has removed himself.
Five DOJ lawyers have their names on the complaint: Assistant Attorney General Tony West, who heads the Civil Division; U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke; Arthur Goldberg, an assistant director in the Federal Programs Branch; and trial attorneys Varu Chilakamarri and Joshua Wilkenfeld.
Updated at 4:23 p.m.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
So the only remaining restriction is that elections must be non-partisan? Or are there other restrictions left intact?
http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/blog-folder/wersal.pdf
Mucho Thanks to Greg Wersal is not fighting alone
In re:Scarrella4Justice 221NW2d562 Published by Judicial Tryanny without Royalitys to circumvent MN Const. Art. III Separation of Powers, Voting Rights Act Eligible to Vote then and therefore Eligible for ANY OFFICE.
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_1st Husband Scarrella for Quiet Titles Search is the only Certified Sane Candidate for MN Attorney General
http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com on the Graves of Tenants in Common and Murder of 2nd Husband http://www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com Sharons Quo Warranto at http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com We must have Decency,Morality,Judicial Reform 4 Accountability in Government Sharon opposes ShariaLaw_We must Repeal ObamaCare and or “If it aint broke don’t fix it” Medicare does not include Dental_Glasses,Hearin Aids_ Stand with AZ v. the Feds Immigration Reform.
WERSAL THE WEASAL4JUSTICE WE LOVE YOU WE THE COMMAN PERSONS.